"she couldn't tell"? Could it have been a foot? A mannequin limb in the change room perhaps? Maybe a mop? She couldn't remember the year...???
haha you've been played.
Trump loses 6% in the polls since his fake ear injury
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
haha you've been played.
Its that kind of response that resulted in a judge saying rump owes $85 million for defamation.
She sure outsmarted Trump to the tune of nearly 100 million dollars. What kind of an idiot doesn't take the stand to defend himself against such ridiculous allegations ? Trump was had. What a fool
It shows how biased the judge was. If it was a criminal court case, it would have been thrown out.
At least it gave the judge and the prosecutor an opportunity to catch up since the time they were work chums.
Correct...she fooled everyone including the judge. Which is why I commend her for being so clever at turning fiction into money.
Judges, skoob, and jury.
First the $2 million ruling, then the $85 million ruling when rump, like you, lied his face off about the rulings and then the defamation trial where another judge said its legally correct to call rump a rapist.
If you were in charge Carroll would be back upping the damages again.
Losers, the both of you.
No, skoob.
rump didn't fool anyone but you and the rest of the cult.
Somehow he convinced you that he would never rape anyone.
How did that happen?
You must feel so silly being played.
You really don't care about this except it fuels your TDS. Deep down I know you think it was a sham but you won't admit it.
Says the guy that was convinced a Xitter post was accurate, then had to apologize for falling for it.
Ever wonder why no one takes you seriously? That's a clue.
rump has to pay $85 million for slandering one of his rape victims.
This clearly makes you proud or rump and jealous that you don't get to rape and can't afford to pay for it.
Now you have delusions that you speak for everyone here?
Go get an appointment at a vet.
Your word salads on the topic are becoming more unhinged.
Sounds like you're upset that Trump was robbed of his money...you're coming around.
I'm confident that based on the number of people that have you on ignore, and the only ones that respond positively to your posts are your own accounts, I would say that no one takes you seriously is a reasonable conclusion.
rump has to pay $85 million for slandering one of his rape victims.
This clearly makes you proud or rump and jealous that you don't get to rape and can't afford to pay for it.
Part of me enjoys watching you turn into a conspiracy theorist; the other art of me is laughing at your hypocrisy.
Put both parts together and it makes me happy watching you slowly sink into the rabbit hole.
Some MAGA wacko thinks that I'm the one backing conspiracy theories?
Dunning Kruger champion work there, skoob.
What does that have anything to do with what I said?
Right, but you're the only person seeming to claim that the definition of rape is entirely dependent on what jurisdiction you are in.
No argument.
They did not think he stuck his penis in her vagina, which is the definition of rape in New York.
You either believe that definition is the only valid definition of rape, or you believe that criminal court is the only thing that defines rape jurisdiction by jurisdiction (which gets us back to "it is impossible to rape someone in Canada").
I know neither of those is actually true, of course, since you have said repeatedly that you just don't believe court cases you don't think reached the right decision.
I never said otherwise.
You're the one who said there is no burden of proof at all.
You're not about to say that the burden of proof for believing anything ever is "beyond a reasonable doubt", are you?
Because that's obviously idiotic and you wouldn't even be able to pretend you really believed that for any length of time.
Yes!
Exactly.
It's a very strict standard for a very specific reason to check the power of the State in terms of depriving someone of life and liberty.
It's not for everyday use, but is rather extremely high and exacting due to the overwhelming power of the State.
Who said anything about convicting Trump based on this?
Or anyone?
That would be ridiculous and extremely dangerous for society.
Totally agreed.
But respecting the court decision has nothing to do with whether or not someone gets to say Trump is a rapist.
Other than, of course, the State.
That is not remotely the point you have been making.
You've been saying that people can't call Trump a rapist because the jury in the Carroll case did not find him liable for rape under the laws of New York State.
It's a silly position that requires you to believe some pretty crazy things.
For instance, see below.
You keep posting this like it is some kind of winning argument.
Well no, that's not right at all.
Yes, people can have their opinion.
But he didn't serve a day in jail for his actions against E Jean Carroll because the statute of limitations had expired.
There was never any chance for him to serve jail time for it, no matter what the outcome of the trial.