I think we discussed that in subsequent posts.Based on what factual info to the contrary.
I think we discussed that in subsequent posts.Based on what factual info to the contrary.
And by the way, next you will claim that Canada gave the Millhaven Institution to the inmates.Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.
There are radical forces on both sides who use such language. Netanyahu's cabinet is made up some of those radicals on the Israeli side.Israel is not blameless. But its position is not anywhere near as radical as a call for wiping out israel “from the river to the sea”.
So it should be easy to provide facts as how meritless the theory is.See above. This article and its writer have no credibility. Its one guy maintaining a website with a few articles. None of the contributors are credentialed. Credentials are important.
I disagree, genocide is more radical than a call for viping out Israel.Israel is not blameless. But its position is not anywhere near as radical as a call for wiping out israel “from the river to the sea”.
No substance to your post. Only ad hominem.Why would I care about your views about Haaretz or what you think about hate?
You back genocide.
Some radicals in israel use this language versus the entire pro Palestinian movement and their supporters including all the shithole countries and western useful idiots use this language.There are radical forces on both sides who use such language. Netanyahu's cabinet is made up some of those radicals on the Israeli side.
Perhaps. Perhaps my debating skills are not as strong as yours. But I am not debating. The discussion is whether the Palestinian identity is valid today. Which it is. Without it we wouldn't have a Israeli Palestinian conflict.So it should be easy to provide facts as how meritless the theory is.
All you've got is "shoot the messenger". Your debating skills are as weak as Geno's.
You don't attempt it. You shout it down from the mountaintops..
This is not true. It is falsely interpreted that way, but it is not true.Some radicals in israel use this language versus the entire pro Palestinian movement and their supporters including all the shithole countries and western useful idiots use this language.
Some radicals in israel use this language versus the entire pro Palestinian movement and their supporters including all the shithole countries and western useful idiots use this language.
No substance to your post. Only ad hominem.
Oh yeah? What’s the true meaning then? That Jews would live next doors with Gazans happily in a new amazing Palestine?This is not true. It is falsely interpreted that way, but it is not true.
Oh yeah? What’s the true meaning then? That Jews would live next doors with Gazans happily in a new amazing Palestine?
Their identity exists, but it exists in conjunction with the conflict. If israel somehow relocated to Texas and the entire Palestine was left to arabs and if big players like Iran stopped fueling the issue, they would quickly forget their Palestinian identity and started to happily kill each other based on new issues, tribal and religious and whatever else. In fact Hezbollah and Hamas probably would divide the land.Perhaps. Perhaps my debating skills are not as strong as yours. But I am not debating. The discussion is whether the Palestinian identity is valid today. Which it is. Without it we wouldn't have a Israeli Palestinian conflict.
Their identity exists with the conflict. If israel somehow relocated to Texas and the entire Palestine was left to arabs and if big players like Iran stopped fueling the issue, they would quickly forget their Palestinian identity and started to happily kill each other based on new issues, tribal and religious and whatever else.
But as we discussed the Palestinian label and identity predates the conflict, or even Israel's formation.Their identity exists, but it exists in conjunction with the conflict. If israel somehow relocated to Texas and the entire Palestine was left to arabs and if big players like Iran stopped fueling the issue, they would quickly forget their Palestinian identity and started to happily kill each other based on new issues, tribal and religious and whatever else.
Simply that Palestinians would live on their own terms without Israeli control.Oh yeah? What’s the true meaning then? That Jews would live next doors with Gazans happily in a new amazing Palestine?
Every accusation by a Ziontologist is a confessionNo substance to your post. Only ad hominem.
Not really.But as we discussed the Palestinian label and identity predates the conflict, or even Israel's formation.