But, he is always quick to get on his high horse and (falsely) accuse others of racism/racist.nothing but Jewish supremacist.
But, he is always quick to get on his high horse and (falsely) accuse others of racism/racist.nothing but Jewish supremacist.
But, he is always quick to get on his high horse and (falsely) accuse others of racism/racist.
The occupation happened because of the 6 day war, which the Arab nations started. So it is very much a 2 way street.
Endlessly, and without shame.But, he is always quick to get on his high horse and (falsely) accuse others of racism/racist.
No, not at all.
Sure. So Hamas can replenish, reload and attack again when they feel like. They have no honour. You understand that concept, don't you. Not a good strategy for Israel.No shack, I keep calling for a ceasefire.
Yes, but the Sikhs got nothing at all. Not even a small piece of the Punjab.A bit like the way the Sikhs were promised their own state for backing the Brits.
No, not at all.
What part of Hamas, terrorist organization, funded, armed to the teeth and directed by Iran being extinguished and being deprived of their terrorist resources and infrastructure which has proven to be an existential military/terrorist threat to Israel are you unable and unwilling to comprehend?
Hamas, Hamas, Hamas.
Yes, but the Sikhs got nothing at all. Not even a small piece of the Punjab.
So are you saying the 6 day war was justified?
Regardless of that, if they wanted Palestinian statehood, why did they not form one after Gaza was occupied by Egypt and West Bank by Jordan?
Also you forget, the only people there are not just the Palestinians. The Israelis have just as much a claim to the land as the Palestinians do. So it is not just the Palestinian preference that is important here.
Because if you argue that it is, then you are basically saying Jews do not have a right to the land, or that Israel should not have a right to exist. Is that your position?
Sikhs were never promised a state of their own. They infact agreed to not have a state of their own and join India. And they currently don't want it either. But that is irrelevant to this and let us not derail this thread with an unrelated topic. There are 2 threads for our resident TERBite's Khalistan fetish/pipe dream.
An idea that israel with population of 7 million can demolish the wall and absorb 2 mln Gazans is absurd.So are you saying the 6 day war was justified?
Regardless of that, if they wanted Palestinian statehood, why did they not form one after Gaza was occupied by Egypt and West Bank by Jordan?
Also you forget, the only people there are not just the Palestinians. The Israelis have just as much a claim to the land as the Palestinians do. So it is not just the Palestinian preference that is important here.
Because if you argue that it is, then you are basically saying Jews do not have a right to the land, or that Israel should not have a right to exist. Is that your position?
Sikhs were never promised a state of their own. They infact agreed to not have a state of their own and join India. And they currently don't want it either. But that is irrelevant to this and let us not derail this thread with an unrelated topic. There are 2 threads for our resident TERBite's Khalistan fetish/pipe dream.
![]()
Illinois lawyer fired from comptroller’s office after antisemitic tirade
“Hitler should have eradicated all of you,” Chowdhury wrote in one message.thepostmillennial.com
An idea that israel with population of 7 million can demolish the wall and absorb 2 mln Gazans is absurd.
Hamas will simply spread everywhere in the West Bank and beyond and will not stop until israel doesn’t exist anymore.
That’s why all the calls for “end of occupation” are either naive or malicious.
But regardless of whether or not you consider the British partition as justified, that is 100 year old history. Israel is a sovereign, established, recognized state TODAY where the majority of its citizens were born and raised there.
So in sum:
1. Israel has a right to exist and that has to be acknowledged.
2. Any peace or statehood has to be negotiated on present day realities. Not on pre-1948, 1949 or 1967. Those days are long gone.
3. The Nabka refugees are no longer refugees and should not have a right to return.
PS: Sikhs were never promised a state. 60% of Punjab went to Pakistan, so if they want one today, let them go to Pakistan and ask them. Again don't derail this one with this unrelated issue. Post it in the other thread.
Israel's international borders are recognized. Pre-67, it was the Green Line but presently, the West Bank (Areas A, B and C) and Gaza, both fall within Israeli territory and yes they are occupied and controlled by Israel. Although Areas A and B are under Palestinian administration. But generally Israel is recognized to be everything except Gaza and West Bank today.
They do. People = countries. There does not have to be any law for this. It simply, is. If you act on this premise against any country, they will be justified in using force against you, the same as Israel.
So present day realities. The Palestinians will undoubtedly get a much smaller state if they want one, and they'd have to be okay with that for the sake of peace and for the sake of their future generations. A lot of this was also their fault.
They shouldn't. It is a ridiculous proposition.