Killing 1,400 civilians is self defense? Were the 250 at the music festival about to invade and behead babies?Those rights include the right to self defence, which you give only to Israelis.
There is your example of hate speech.
Killing 1,400 civilians is self defense? Were the 250 at the music festival about to invade and behead babies?Those rights include the right to self defence, which you give only to Israelis.
Killing 1,400 civilians is self defense? Were the 250 at the music festival about to invade and behead babies?
There is your example of hate speech.
And as you have never, ever said, the attack of Oct. 7 was a terrorist attack and that you condemn it. You are a phony. Your words are hollow.No shack, as I've said every day here for the last 11 days.
And as you have never, ever said, the attack of Oct. 7 was a terrorist attack and that you condemn it. You are a phony. Your words are hollow.
A sweeping generality.I have repeatedly, shack.
Both Israel and Hamas have committed war crimes and terrorism and both should be held to account.
A sweeping generality.
That does not specifically mention Oct. 7. So no, you have not.
Condemn the the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas as an act of terrorism.
Otherwise your sweeping declarations are hollow words. What you are saying is not what you really feel.
As expected. You are still afraid to call Oct. 7 a terrorist attack, even though you "claim" to be against all terrorism. That is not consistent.As expected,
As expected. You are still afraid to call Oct. 7 a terrorist attack, even though you "claim" to be against all terrorism. That is not consistent.
Clearly not. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. The only person you are fooling is yourself.I did, shack.
Clearly not. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. The only person you are fooling is yourself.
You know, you are so lost, I almost feel sorry for you. Almost.As stated before, I said it and you won't accept it.
Kind of like how you won't accept how Palestinians are humans.
Kind of like how you refuse to condemn torture, rape, apartheid and genocide.
You know, you are so lost, I almost feel sorry for you. Almost.
You cannot condemn Israel's retaliation to a Hamas attack while justifying said attack. You are clearly justifying Gazans' deaths.
"Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants (mostly civilians and neutral military personnel)"shack, tell me your definition of terrorism.
Explain to me why you think you're not the terrorist supporter.
"Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants (mostly civilians and neutral military personnel)"
This describes the Oct. 7 attack that terrorist organization Hamas (as listed on Canada's terrorism list. The same Canadian terrorism list that YOU referenced yesterday) launched causing the death of 1,400 civilians. I wholeheartedly do not support this act of terrorism. I have denounced and continue to denounce this act. You have never condemned THIS PARTICULAR ATTACK. You speak in generalities which means nothing.
You, however continue to justify this attack of terror (as per the above definition). Justification=Support. YOU ARE THE TERRORIST SUPPORTER.
While at the same time making excuses for Hamas.I have repeatedly, shack.
...
Are you trying to pretend shack is a Jew too?We know you can't feel sorry for anyone who isn't part of your tribe.
...
I'll tell you mine.shack, tell me your definition of terrorism.
...